**PLEASE NOTE: Due to the aftermath of the Boston Marathon Bombing in 2013, this meeting was cancelled. Papers that were read at the following Fall Chapter meeting are marked below.***
The abstracts for the papers are included here, but the meeting did not take place.
Melanie Lowe, "Topics of Consumer Identity in the 1780s: Pleyel’s op. 1 and Mozart’s op. 10 String Quartets"
John Forrestal, "“Always is Always Forever”: The Musical Trajectory of the Process Church of the Final Judgement" [READ AT Fall 2013 Chapter Meeting]
David Ferrandino, "Pop at the Symphony: The Reciprocal Influence of Philip Glass and David Bowie"
Philip Glass's career has been deeply impacted by his collaborations with other musicians, artists, dancers and cinematographers. Some of these, most notably Koyaanisqatsi (1982) and his opera trilogy, are widely discussed and appreciated while other pieces remain overlooked. Glass's symphonic efforts remain a neglected aspect of his work, overshadowed by the visibility of his theatrical productions. According to Glass Biographer Robert Maycock, "symphonies were something that a progressive artist just did not do...nobody who wanted to be taken seriously by the leaders of opinion would touch it.” Perhaps because of this stigma, Glass chose to base his first symphony, Symphony No. 1 “Low” (1993), on a popular album written by David Bowie and produced by Brian Eno. Pleased with the results, the three artists collaborated again on Symphony No. 4 “Heroes” in 1996. In contrast to such albums as Symphonic Rock by the London Symphony Orchestra, Glass's symphonies are not simply arrangements of rock originals. Themes are extracted from the selected tracks and then composed out through the usual techniques of Glass's style. The end result is more of a commentary on the originals than anything approaching faithful reiteration: the formal constructions are modified, the thematic material is reworked and transformed, and the resultant affect of each piece is altered. In this paper I explore the musical details of Glass's “Low” Symphony and “Heroes” Symphony in order to reveal the web of artistic intersections that make these projects stand out from the rest of Glass’s output and to show how these pieces really are mutual creative acts. It is no accident that Glass chose to work with materials from these specific popular artists as he and Reich both had a strong influence on the popular music of the 1970s. Both Bowie and Eno were at the London premiere of Music with Changing Parts by the Philip Glass Ensemble in 1971 and both of their musical pieces began to exhibit the drones and repeated figures of minimalism after that. These symphonies become more complex when compared with the source albums, revealing the reciprocal influence between the minimalist and popular music spheres. Within this dialogue are points of synchronization as well as moments of disjunction and when the symphony breaks away from the album, Glass’s music becomes a commentary on Bowie’s original piece and a true collaboration between compositional voices emerges.
Michael Uy, "Staging Catfish Row in the Soviet Union: Porgy and Bess as “Cultural Exchange”"
The abstracts for the papers are included here, but the meeting did not take place.
Melanie Lowe, "Topics of Consumer Identity in the 1780s: Pleyel’s op. 1 and Mozart’s op. 10 String Quartets"
By considering
the role of topics in the musical experience of late eighteenth-century
amateur musical consumers, this paper addresses: 1) the role of
burgeoning consumerism in the formation of taste and consumer identity;
and 2) relationships between patterns of consumption and musical style.
While there is frustratingly little documentation that reveals the
listening experiences of amateur consumers, the music itself offers a
rich source of information. As practitioners of a rhetorical art,
eighteenth-century composers tailored their music for a specific
audience. Given the commercial realities of the musical marketplace,
most of the music that was published was marketed to non-professionals
for private performance. The commercial success of a publication
therefore greatly depended on how well the composer accommodated the
musical competencies of Liebhaber.
Examples from two sets of string quartets composed
and published in the 1780s will serve to explore the intersubjective
stylistic knowledge of musical consumers: Pleyel’s Op. 1 which enjoyed
tremendous commercial success and were clearly composed with Liebhaber in mind; and Mozart’s Op. 10, which were notoriously “Liebhaber unfriendly” and far less successful commercially.
My analyses of Pleyel’s and Mozart’s quartets
take up questions of topical enrichment and parametric density;
mechanisms of topical coding; interactions between topical content,
syntactical function, and formal articulation; and associations with
social, cultural, and musical life. [abstract abbreviated]
Lester Zhuqing Hu, "“Sing with Me a Sweet and New Song”: Chromatic Tournament in Lasso’s “Opus One”" [READ AT Fall 2013 Chapter Meeting]
The first printed collection of Lasso’s work
(Antwerp: Susato, 1555) ends with two of the earliest chromatic
polyphonic compositions of the sixteenth century: Lasso’s “Alma Nemes,”
and Rore’s “Calami sonum ferentes.” Lowinsky reads Rore’s “Calami” as an
“antichromatic manifesto,” the sound of which satirized Vicentino’s
advocacy for chromaticism. Most scholars accept Lowinsky’s
interpretation, but I question his reading of Rore’s motet as a mockery
of chromaticism. Both Rore’s “Calami” and Lasso’s “Alma” set texts that
call for a “new and sweet sound”—a cue for chromaticism, commonly
associated with the soave affect and the resurrection of ancient Greek
music.
Although Lasso’s “Alma” seems to emulate Rore’s work, I demonstrate that there are crucial differences between the two composers’ approaches to chromaticism. Rore employs numerous melodic chromatic semitones; Lasso uses only a few. Rore takes advantage of contrasting interval affects within the chromatic idiom; Lasso employs an unusually large number of major sonorities. Both pieces are set in the E-durus tonal type, but “Alma” follows the conventional course of E-Phrygian with cadences on E and A while “Calami” ventures to B and F-sharp as local tonal centers.
I argue that these two motets suggest that
already in its earliest examples in the sixteenth century chromaticism
was adapted to serve different musical functions and styles. In the
tradition of Venetian madrigals, Rore’s chromaticism responds to the
text with local expressive effects. The trajectory of interval affects
and local tonal centers follow the psychological journey of the text.
Influenced by Roman-Neapolitan madrigals, Lasso’s chromaticism eschews
local drama but creates a peculiar ambience for the whole. Homophonic
progressions of major triads embody the “new and sweet” sound called for
by the text. Rore’s dramatic effects and Lasso’s otherworldly
atmosphere provide the foundation for two distinct legacies in the
history of Renaissance chromaticism.Although Lasso’s “Alma” seems to emulate Rore’s work, I demonstrate that there are crucial differences between the two composers’ approaches to chromaticism. Rore employs numerous melodic chromatic semitones; Lasso uses only a few. Rore takes advantage of contrasting interval affects within the chromatic idiom; Lasso employs an unusually large number of major sonorities. Both pieces are set in the E-durus tonal type, but “Alma” follows the conventional course of E-Phrygian with cadences on E and A while “Calami” ventures to B and F-sharp as local tonal centers.
Eric Rice, "Regret in Gombert’s Mass for the Coronation of Charles V"
On 24 February
1530, Pope Clement VII crowned the Habsburg ruler Charles V as Holy
Roman Emperor in Bologna. It is clear from what we know of Charles’s
personality that the ceremony — and especially its music — was important
to him. A surviving mass by Nicolas Gombert, who was master of the
emperor’s choirboys at the time, bears the title “Missa A la
incoronation” in its earliest printed source, and its use in the
coronation has never been questioned.
There were three main influences on the choice
of texts and music sung at the event: first, the prescribed texts of
the imperial coronation ritual; second, the political situation in
Europe at the time; and third, the relationship of the first and second
of these with the celebration of mass, including plainchant propers and
at least two motets. This paper will touch on each of these in an effort
to understand the context in which Gombert’s mass was heard and in what
ways it might have been understood by its listeners. The work is a
parody mass based on a chanson by Jean Richafort titled Sur tous
regretz. This chanson — and therefore Gombert’s mass — has a somber
character, and it is tempting to associate the choice of the mass’s
model as representative of Charles’s feelings of regret following the
1527 Sack of Rome, which was undertaken by his own troops against his
wishes. A more plausible explanation, one suggested by contemporaneous
sources, is that Charles was particularly enamored with chansons of this
kind and associated them as much with solemnity as sadness. Indeed, it
may have been a family tradition: Marguerite of Austria, Charles’s aunt,
was known to have owned a manuscript full of such “regret” chansons.
John Forrestal, "“Always is Always Forever”: The Musical Trajectory of the Process Church of the Final Judgement" [READ AT Fall 2013 Chapter Meeting]
The Process
Church of the Final Judgment (1964-1974) was a Scientological offshoot
created by two former members of the London branch. Their
experimentations with psychotherapy led to the development of an
incredibly tight-knit group of followers, who subsequently made a
pilgrimage to the Yucatàn peninsula of Mexico where a natural disaster
imbued their collective spirituality with apocalyptic reinterpretations
of Christian theology. Upon returning to London and the States, the
Process took their eschatological message to the streets. The Process'
religious canon contained a large musical output; rock bands within the
cult developed out of collective musical energies, in addition to hymns
and chants that served a Utilitarian purpose. Members of the Process
were contiguously in the same social circles as many famous musicians,
such as Mick Jagger. Thus, their influence can be seen in the popular
musical idioms of their time, although there’s little mentioned in
biographical accounts about their influence.
Over three decades since the schism that
marked the end of the Process, their teachings ostensibly live on today,
through a musical collective known as Holy Terror, and through a band
“the Sabbath Assembly” reinterpreting the hymns of the Process. My
intention is to recreate the historical framework of this unique
religious movement, especially the cross-relationships between it and
the popular music of their time. Upon providing a solid foundation, my
intent is to explore the lineage and re-adaptation of Processean
ideology in this contemporary musical milieu, and the processes
of change that take place in the religious tenets intrinsic to
Processean thought and the mindsets of contemporaneous re-interpreters. I
also intend to explore Holy Terrorism within its subcultural context,
and its relation to a larger global narrative–particularly the over
sensationalized eschatological concepts that are inextricably
intertwined in the moral, political, and sociological fabrics of
mainstream contemporary society.
David Ferrandino, "Pop at the Symphony: The Reciprocal Influence of Philip Glass and David Bowie"
Philip Glass's career has been deeply impacted by his collaborations with other musicians, artists, dancers and cinematographers. Some of these, most notably Koyaanisqatsi (1982) and his opera trilogy, are widely discussed and appreciated while other pieces remain overlooked. Glass's symphonic efforts remain a neglected aspect of his work, overshadowed by the visibility of his theatrical productions. According to Glass Biographer Robert Maycock, "symphonies were something that a progressive artist just did not do...nobody who wanted to be taken seriously by the leaders of opinion would touch it.” Perhaps because of this stigma, Glass chose to base his first symphony, Symphony No. 1 “Low” (1993), on a popular album written by David Bowie and produced by Brian Eno. Pleased with the results, the three artists collaborated again on Symphony No. 4 “Heroes” in 1996. In contrast to such albums as Symphonic Rock by the London Symphony Orchestra, Glass's symphonies are not simply arrangements of rock originals. Themes are extracted from the selected tracks and then composed out through the usual techniques of Glass's style. The end result is more of a commentary on the originals than anything approaching faithful reiteration: the formal constructions are modified, the thematic material is reworked and transformed, and the resultant affect of each piece is altered. In this paper I explore the musical details of Glass's “Low” Symphony and “Heroes” Symphony in order to reveal the web of artistic intersections that make these projects stand out from the rest of Glass’s output and to show how these pieces really are mutual creative acts. It is no accident that Glass chose to work with materials from these specific popular artists as he and Reich both had a strong influence on the popular music of the 1970s. Both Bowie and Eno were at the London premiere of Music with Changing Parts by the Philip Glass Ensemble in 1971 and both of their musical pieces began to exhibit the drones and repeated figures of minimalism after that. These symphonies become more complex when compared with the source albums, revealing the reciprocal influence between the minimalist and popular music spheres. Within this dialogue are points of synchronization as well as moments of disjunction and when the symphony breaks away from the album, Glass’s music becomes a commentary on Bowie’s original piece and a true collaboration between compositional voices emerges.
Michael Uy, "Staging Catfish Row in the Soviet Union: Porgy and Bess as “Cultural Exchange”"
For three weeks
between 1955 and 1956 – only several months after the important Geneva
Summit of “The Big Four” – the Everyman Opera Company staged George
Gershwin’s Porgy and Bess in Leningrad and Moscow. In the
previous two years, the Robert Breen and Blevins Davis production had
toured Europe and Latin America, partly subsidized by the U.S. State
Department Cultural Presentations Program. Yet when Breen negotiated a
tour to perform in Russia, the American government withdrew funding,
stating that a production would be too “politically premature.” U.S.
officials perceived the opera’s poor, black characters and dilapidated,
rural setting as an unrepresentative depiction of the country and too
controversial to support in light of the growing Civil Rights Movement.
Surprisingly, however, the production was performed because at the last
minute, the Soviet Ministry of Culture agreed to pay the tour costs in
full.
This paper examines the performances in
Leningrad, as chronicled by Soviet and black American periodicals,
interviews with surviving cast members, and Truman Capote’s
extraordinary account in The Muses are Heard. Archival evidence
from the Robert Breen Papers, including American and Soviet government
correspondence, reveals how Porgy was caught between competing personal
and institutional interests in both countries. Officials in the United
States Information Agency and the American National Theater and Academy
were wary that the Russians would use Porgy as proof of
minority oppression in a capitalist system. In the Soviet Union, Nikolai
Bulganin and Nikita Khrushchev, who were still consolidating political
leadership after Stalin’s death, responded with skepticism and
questioned American commitment to “cultural exchange.” These documents
uncover the myriad difficulties of staging an opera during the Cold War
that was performed by black artists, written by white authors, rejected
by the American government, and sponsored by the Soviet Union.
Comments
Post a Comment